As yesterday’s massive 0.35% collapse in property stocks shows, the Hong Kong government is finally getting tough with developers’ sales tactics. After consultations in an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding, officials are now politely requesting the real estate cartel to voluntarily:
- tell prospective home-buyers where the property will be
- tell them the price more than five minutes before they sign on the dotted line at midnight while panicked crowds outside bang on the door insisting to be allowed in to pay 10% more
- give them a somewhat-you-know-kinda-vaguely better idea of what the apartment will actually look like, eg, where the walls will be
- conceal advance cut-price sales to family and friends more effectively, so everyone else doesn’t get so upset
courtesy of Glengarry Glen Ross
In return, the government assures property developers that it will:
- continue to keep land in artificially short supply to keep prices high
- permit them to continue colluding at land auctions and in sales timing, pricing, etc
- let them carry on adding 200 square feet of elevator shaft, stairwell, external air-conditioner platform, hallway, entrance lobby, pigeons’ nest and mailbox interior to every 500 square feet of advertised apartment area
- publicly defend their inalienable right to make profit margins of at least 50%
- recognize their children’s contribution to the community by naming them Justices of the Peace this year, giving them Gold Bauhinia Stars further ahead and actively considering the possibility of dukedoms
If the developers fail to give the general impression that they are going along with this deal, officials will talk about giving active consideration to the potential possibility of discussing statutory measures at some stage in the future, though of course without doing anything that might threaten our Healthy Property Market.
This is of course a Good Thing for the community, as it guarantees the market stability we enjoy from having high property prices and avoids the dreaded market volatility we would suffer if homes became more affordable.
On the one hand, it means home-buyers will be ripped off about 1% less than before. On the other hand, this deal recognizes that, unlike in other parts of the planet, the gross domestic product in Hong Kong rises every time someone sells a property for more than they bought it. And if families didn’t have to spend at least 35% of their incomes over a 20-year period to buy a 400-square-foot home, the economy would collapse. And without the multiple billions of dollars in profit being made by the property cartel every year, tycoons would make fewer donations to mainland universities and local medical schools, cross-border integration and partnership would cease, there would be widespread unemployment, all our babies would catch rickets and men’s penises would shrivel up and drop off.
So we have struck a good balance.
The nice thing about living outside the UK is that people stop going on about the price of their houses. Then we read you, obsessed with the issue. Houseowners deserve what they get. Eat the rich. Property is theft. Hang the landlords. And change the record please. It’s sooooooooooo tedious.
Too true , too true, again I say ALL TOO TRUE
Lands dept and the HK govt are the lapdogs of the developers. If the lapdogs dare even so much as to whimper, let alone bite their masters they get put down . But nice lapdogs get to become directors of property companies once they are past their use – by age in govt. Very cosy. Family bliss.
“…he said another two large residential sites in Tung Chung and Fanling triggered from the list will be auctioned May 11 and 24. They will provide a total of 2,550 units.”
The number is exact and on the (same planning-zoning) ratio of 75:25, implies 1683 Tung Chung flats on between 846,000 sf (plot ratio 3) @ 60% and 1,410.000 sf (plot ratio 5) @ 60%; and 867 Fanling flats on 370,000 sf (minimum govt. spec.) @ 60%. It also implies flat size of a mix of 837 sf and 1395 sf for each site.
The auction reserve trigger price ratio between the two sites is 1:1.09. If the developmt costs are 8K psf the minimum sale price @ 50% margin is 12K TC (10K already achieved for La Mer) and 13K Fanling. By 2012.
Ripped off about 1% less?! More like ripped off like 0.1% less! The essential problem is a parasitic relationship. The government relys on the developers for the bulk of their revenue through land sales. The developers rely on the government to control land supply to inflate prices. In other words, they need to look after each other’s interest to survive. In such an environment, how on earth can the government actually “stand up” to the developers for the sake of it’s citizens? You are not so naive to believe the government actually has citizen’s well-being in mind?
If only HKers had realised that the sales tax might have liberated them. Might.
I note increasing numbers of up-and-coming young managers are now leaving their posts with developers to join the ranks of our civil service – in such places as Planning and Lands Departments. It will be interesting to see whether they re-join their former employers upon “retirement”, and to what extent they oil the wheels of said former employers while serving the citizens … 😉