Mid-week links for the gentry…

Hong Kong Free Press puts Chief Executive Carrie Lam on the spot by asking her whether it could be illegal for the media to cover people who make pro-independence remarks. (That’s gratitude, after all she’s done for them.)

Any answer short of ‘no, why should it be?’ implicitly confirms that criminalization of ideas is on the way, so the lady was doomed from the start. She could have dismissed the question as hypothetical, but that word has already been claimed by Benny Tai’s independence-related comments at the infamous Taiwan conference, so she couldn’t. Instead, she basically said it depends on how the law evolves, which isn’t too bad considering she had no warning of the question – unless you thought freedom of speech might be secure in Hong Kong, in which case it is shocking.

More about Benny Tai and the conference here. It will not escape the notice of dissenters and trouble-makers in Hong Kong that the pushing of certain buttons provokes predictable degrees of Deranged Ballistic Mouth-froth Freak-out among Communist Party officials. Thus, talk of ‘independence’ sets off a Mega-Tantrum that’s 6 on the Richter scale, and if you combine it with mention of the CCP losing power it hits a 7, and if you utter these words in Taipei, it’s an 8 (as Taiwanese all know, it’s a logarithmic scale).

Deep Throat IPO’s latest opus is so big the executive summaries have executive summaries. He considers global shadow banking and the US$100 trillion it manages mostly in itsy-bitsy places like the Caymans and Luxembourg and, shall we say, certain Asian cities, and how fast these assets plus leverage have been growing compared with world GDP. And the question is: where the hell is all this offshore wealth actually coming from? The answer seems to be connected with discrepancies/anomalies/lies in international trade data. But that leads to the obvious real question: yes, but where, as in – name the place – does the money come from?

You probably know or can guess the answer, but still – yikes!

Among his references are several discussions touching on China’s unbelievable GDP stability. As with the detailed bulk of Deep Throat IPO’s piece, this is verging on economics-geek territory but worth it if you like that sort of thing: Michael Pettis on how China uses GDP as an input. Much of China’s apparent growth, he says, will be reversed when debt capacity is reached.

On a lighter (reading) note, an update on United Front infiltration in New Zealand.

 

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Mid-week links for the gentry…

  1. reductio says:

    Ref. the legality of media coverage. I bet a 1000 bucks (ok a thousand yen) that some wumao will bring up the waddabout the BBC not being allowed to interview IRA/Sinn Fein members back in the day (and the subsequent farce of using actors voices). See, even liberal democracies are the same as repressive totalitarian states.

  2. Old Newcomer says:

    @reductio – the IRA had effectively declared war on the UK. I don’t see Benny Tai, Joshua Wong and Nathan Law taking up arms against China – though you are probably right that the PRC will seek to draw a parallel, however inappropriate.

  3. dimuendo says:

    Reductio

    Correction. It was never illegal to interview representatives of Sinn Fein or even the IRA. As you it was made unlawful to broadcast the voices of those interviewed. The farce (agreed) of using actors (with Irish accents) to vice the comments I think actually helped the IRA not least as the actor who voiced Gerry Adams at least sounded human, unlike the man’s real voice.

    Agree with Old N.

    On a rather less serious matter, sevral of the commentators hereon have almost an obsession as to commenting on the pontifications etc of Mr George Admas (eg see yesterday). Why? Just ignore him, as much is ignored in HK and elsewhere if it is disagreed with. Commenting merely encourages him. Indeed the near constant moans are as wearying and boring as the utterings of the individual who is derided.

    Please quit.

  4. reductio says:

    @ON and d

    Thanks for pointing that out, I stand corrected. While I’m here, just musing, if it ever became illegal to interview Benny Tai et al, would it also be illegal to interview someone who interviewed them?

  5. Chinese Netizen says:

    @dimuendo regarding the ignorable Windbag: Hear hear!

Comments are closed.